Non-Significant Results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Prerequisites
Questions
- What does it mean to accept the null hypothesis?
- Why the null hypothesis should not be accepted?
- How a non-significant result can increase confidence that the null hypothesis is false?
- What are the problems of affirming a negative conclusion?
- When P-value is high, it means that the data provide little or no evidence that the null hypothesis is false
- The high p-value is not evidence that the null hypothesis is true
- The problem is that it is impossible to distinguish a null effect from a very small effect
- For example, in the James Bond Case Study, suppose Mr. Bond is, in fact, just barely better than chance at judging whether a Martini was shaken or stirred
- Assume he has a 0.51 probability of being correct on a given trial (π = 0.51)
- Let's say Experimenter Jones (who did not know π = 0.51) tested Mr. Bond and found he was correct 49 times out of 100 tries. * How would the significance test come out? The experimenter’s significance test would be based on the assumption that Mr. Bond has a 0.50 probability of being correct on each trial (π = 0.50). Given this assumption, the probability of his being correct 49 or more times out of 100 is 0.62
- 0.62 is far higher than 0.05
- This result, therefore, does not give even a hint that the null hypothesis is false
- However, we know (but Experimenter Jones does not) that π = 0.51 and not 0.50 and therefore that the null hypothesis is false
- So, if Experimenter Jones had concluded that the null hypothesis were true based on the statistical analysis, he or she would have been mistaken
Concluding that the null hypothesis is true is called accepting the null hypothesis. To do so is a serious error.
Questions