BPMS Comparison Matrix

From Training Material
Revision as of 18:45, 24 November 2014 by Cesar Chew (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This table shows which vendor supports which feature. Please read the detailed description of the features of BPMS in BPMS Comparison section.

Comparison Matrix

Feature jBPM 5.4 (community) BonitaSoft Oracle BPM PegaSystems ProcessMaker
Web Interface for process modelling Oryx N/A Yes
BPMN 2.0 compliance level TODO Based on BPMN 2.0 Upcoming BPMN 2.0 support
Process Versoning Yes Yes
Rule Engine Integration Yes/Drools native N/A Yes
Human Tasks and console Yes/plugable Yes/not plugable
Web Service integration (plugins to existing systems) TODO WSDL 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 compliant
Persistent options Yes Yes
Cloud and scalability support No Cloud Multitenancy support, Load balancing support.
Scripting Tasks supported languages Java/MVEL Java PHP triggers.
Community Yes (TODO Yes (OSS)
Availability of vendor independent support Yes, extensive Yes Yes
Easiness of process deployment One click Very Easy
Standard based (WSDL, REST, JSON, etc...) WSDL, REST WSDL 1.1, SOAP 1.2, ExtJS 3.4
Process Migration (from older version to newer) Yes Yes
Multiple version of the engine running at the same time Easy No
BAM Through Pentaho third party BI Tool
Declarative call for web services from the designer NO Yes
Simulation No
Expose API via Web Services (e.g. start a process) Yes, WSDL 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 compliant
Service repository support Yes
Automatic Optimization No
Right-to-left writing support Yes
Execute BPMN 2.0 Upcoming support for XPDL