Change Management
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Source: Change Management: The People Side of Change, Jeffrey Hiatt and Timothy Creasey - Prosci, 2003.
Why Change Management? ⌘
- People resist change (either good or ill)
- Manager can mitigate the resistance
- Technology changes are easier and cheaper these days than people attitude changes and learning
Problems encountered ⌘
- Not adequate time and resources
- Wrong or negative message about the changes
- Employees who become distracted and lost interest
- Value employees left the organization
- More sick leavers or absenteeism
- Unforeseen obstacles poping out of nowhere
- Lack of funding for the change
Executive Concerns ⌘
- Required Investement
- Financial Performance
- ROI
- Completion time
- Improvment capacity
- Impact on customers
Eployee Concerns ⌘
- Impact on my current job
- Job security
- Suitability of the new environment
Two views of Change ⌘
Organizational change management
- the top-down executive view
Individual change management
- bottom-up employee view
Primary change management principles ⌘
- Senders and receivers
- Resistance and comfort
- Authority for change
- Value systems
- Incremental vs. radical change
- The right answer is not enough
- Change is a processes
Senders and Receivers ⌘
- Sender provides information about the change
- Receiver is being given information about the change
- What a Sender says it not what a receiver hears and vice versa
E.g.
Sender: "We will reduce costs by automating this process and move people to more important tasks" Receiver: "I may not have a job"
Preferred Senders ⌘
Immediate supervisors: messages related to personal impact
- personal impact (salary, people I work with)
- day to day responsibilities
Executives: messages related to business issues and opportunities
- external factors driving the change
- issues facing the business
- marketplace drivers
- financial risks
Resistance and comfort ⌘
- "The natural and normal reaction to change is resistance"
- Plan for resistance
- Assess aversion to change from holistic perspective (e.g. what other changes are there)
Authority for change
- Visible and active executive sponsorship
- "Employee resistance increases as the authority and sponsorship for change decreases"
- Sponsor is "the individual or group who has the power to sanction or legitimize change"
Employees will resist the change more if sponsor:
- is incompetent
- has know history of failed changes
- walks away too soon
- is not active and visible throughout the project
Value systems ⌘
- In old hierarchical (military like) structure, change is easier to implement
- The more employees are empowered the harder the change will get (they expected to question management decisions)
Incremental vs. radical change ⌘
- Change management should reflect the change size
- I.e. no "one size fits all" approach
The right answer is not enough ⌘
- Right answer to a business problem is not sufficient to overcome employee resistance
- People resist "we know batter what you want" approach
Change is a processes ⌘
ADKAR:
- Awareness of the need to change
- Desire to participate and support the change
- Knowledge about how to change
- Ability to implement new skills and behaviours
- Reinforcement to keep the change in place
ADKAR and an individual ⌘
- Each person can have a different rate of adapting to change
- I.e. some people can be in an Awareness mode, other already in Reinforcement
- Applying Change Management should be aligned with Project Management
- in the Business need stage, there should be focus on Awareness and Desire of the employees,
- In the Implementation, there should be focus on Knowledge and
ADKAR ⌘
- Individual Change Management framework
- Communication framework
- Diagnostic tool (which department/person is on which stage)
- Corrective Action tool