WebServices: Difference between revisions
Lsokolowski (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary  | 
			
(No difference) 
 | 
Latest revision as of 19:42, 26 June 2018
<slideshow style="nobleprog" headingmark="⌘" incmark="…" scaled="true" font="Trebuchet MS" >
- title
 - Web Services Basics For Non-programmers
 - author
 - Pete George (NobleProg Ltd)
 
</slideshow>
Day One Schedule ⌘
- Introductions
 - Service-Oriented Architecture
 - Web Services Overview
 - XML
 - SOAP
 
Web Services Overview ⌘
Learning Objectives
- To understand what a Web service is
 - To be aware of the development of Web services
 - To understand the reasons for the popularity of Web services
 - To be aware of the existence of Web service standards
 
Web Services Definition ⌘
“a software system designed to support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over a network.” (W3C)
“a means to connect services together.” (Barry, 2013)
Web Service Architecture ⌘
Remote Procedure Call (RPC)⌘
RPC Protocols ⌘
Protocols, e.g. DCOM, specify:
- What address of target computer looks like
 - How data should be packaged
 - How response is retrieved
 - How to initiate call
 - How to handle errors
 
Web Services History ⌘
Web Services History 1 ⌘
Web Services History 2 ⌘
Web Services History 3 ⌘
Web Services Today ⌘
Which Type of Web Service? ⌘
- Best for your development environment
 - Used most by services you will use
 - Used most by external services you will use
 - All of the above
 
Why are Web Services Popular? ⌘
- Business benefits
 - Development benefits
 - Snowball effect
 
Why are Web Services Popular? ⌘
- Business benefits
 
-Easier exchange of data
-Industry-wide standards
-More external services available to all
-Efficient merging of systems (e.g. in acquisitions)
Easier Data Exchange ⌘
- Data elements are sent in addition to value
 
- XML:
 
-<element>value</element>
-E.g. <city>Liverpool</city>
- JSON
 
-“element” : “value”
-E.g. “city”:”Liverpool”
What About Mismatches? ⌘
- Application 1:
 
-<city>Liverpool</city>
-<town>Cheltenham</town>
- Application 2:
 
-<city>Liverpool</city>
-<city>Cheltenham</city>
Agreed Data Exchange Standards ⌘
- Minimize development costs
 - Minimize processing errors
 
Semantic Vocabularies ⌘
- Also known as XML Vocabularies
 - NB: both XML and JSON can use the same vocabularies/elements
 
-<city>Liverpool</city>
-“city”: “Liverpool”
Industry-Wide Standards ⌘
- Web services created opportunity to establish industry-wide standardized vocabularies
 - Two types:
 
-Common Semantic Vocabularies
-Specific Semantic Vocabularies
Common Semantic Vocabularies ⌘
- EXAMPLES
 - Mail.XML
 
-XML specification for communication.
- eXtensible Customer Relationships Language
 
-XML standard specification to represent customer relationships in a standard way.
- Open Office XML
 
-OpenDocument Format (ODF). Open XML-based document file format for office applications.
Specific Semantic Vocabularies ⌘
- EXAMPLES
 - Flexible Image Transport System Markup Language (FITSML)
 
-Astronomy XML specification
- HR-XML
 
-Human Resources XML specification
- DocBook
 
-XML vocabulary for Publishing industry
More External Services Available ⌘
Merging Systems ⌘
Why are Web Services Popular? ⌘
- Development benefits
 
-Interoperability
-Reduced development time
-Reduced maintenance
-Reduced brittleness
Interoperability ⌘
Reduced Development Time ⌘
Reduced Maintenance ⌘
Brittleness ⌘
Reduced Brittleness XML ⌘
Reduced Brittleness JSON ⌘
Why are Web Services Popular? ⌘
- Snowball effect
 
-Popularity of Web services forced vendors to include in their products
- More Web services in products increases popularity
 
-Popularity of Web services ….
-Popularity of Web services create demand for training and tools
- More training and tools increases popularity of Web services
 
-Popularity of Web services…
“WS-” Specifications ⌘
- No single defined set or governing body for Web service specifications
 - “WS-” = shorthand for Web service specifications
 
-WS-Security, WS-Discovery et al
-SOAP
-XML
-etc