<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://training-course-material.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Significance_Testing_and_Confidence_Intervals</id>
	<title>Significance Testing and Confidence Intervals - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Significance_Testing_and_Confidence_Intervals"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Significance_Testing_and_Confidence_Intervals&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T19:30:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Significance_Testing_and_Confidence_Intervals&amp;diff=3317&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Izabela Szlachta at 17:03, 3 February 2012</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Significance_Testing_and_Confidence_Intervals&amp;diff=3317&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-02-03T17:03:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Cat|Hypothesis Testing| 09}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prerequisites&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Confidence Intervals]], [[Introduction to Hypothesis Testing]], [[Significance Testing]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
* How to determine from a confidence interval whether a test is significant?&lt;br /&gt;
* Why a confidence interval makes clear that one should not accept the null hypothesis?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a close relationship between confidence intervals and significance tests&lt;br /&gt;
* Specifically, if a statistic is significantly different from 0 at the 0.05 level then the 95% confidence interval will not contain 0&lt;br /&gt;
* All values in the confidence interval are plausible values for the parameter whereas values outside the interval are rejected as plausible values for the parameter&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Physicians&amp;#039; Reactions case study, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between means extends from 2.00 to 11.26. Therefore, any value lower than 2.00 or higher than 11.26 is rejected as a plausible value for the population difference between means&lt;br /&gt;
* Since zero is lower than 2.00, it is rejected as a plausible value and a test of the null hypothesis that there is no difference between means is significant&lt;br /&gt;
* It turns out that the p value is 0.0057. There is a similar relationship between the 99% confidence interval and Significance at the 0.01 level&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whenever an effect is significant, all values in the confidence interval will be on the same side of zero (either all positive or all negative). Therefore, a significant finding allows the researcher to specify the direction of the effect&lt;br /&gt;
* There are many situations in which it is very unlikely two conditions will have exactly the same population means&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For example, it is practically impossible that aspirin and acetaminophen provide exactly the same degree of pain relief. &lt;br /&gt;
* Therefore, even before an experiment comparing their effectiveness is conducted, the researcher knows that the null hypothesis of exactly no difference is false&lt;br /&gt;
* However, the researcher does not know which drug offers more relief&lt;br /&gt;
* If a test of the difference is significant, then the direction of the difference is established because the values in the confidence interval are either all positive or all negative.&lt;br /&gt;
* If the 95% confidence interval contains zero (more precisely, the parameter value specified in the null hypothesis), then the effect will not be significant at the 0.05 level&lt;br /&gt;
* Looking at non-significant effects in terms of confidence intervals makes clear why the null hypothesis should not be accepted when it is not rejected: Every value in the confidence interval is a plausible value of the parameter&lt;br /&gt;
* Since zero is in the interval, it cannot be rejected&lt;br /&gt;
* However, there is an infinite number of values in the interval (assuming continuous measurement), and none of them can be rejected either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{The null hypothesis for a particular experiment is that the mean test score is 20. If the 99% confidence interval is (18, 24), can you reject the null hypothesis at the 0.01 level?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Yes&lt;br /&gt;
+ No&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{&lt;br /&gt;
{{Show Answer|&lt;br /&gt;
You cannot reject the null hypothesis because the confidence interval shows that 20 is a plausible population parameter.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Select all that apply. Which of these 95% confidence intervals for the difference between means represents a significant difference at the 0.05 level?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ (-4.6, -1.8)&lt;br /&gt;
- (-0.2, 8.1)&lt;br /&gt;
- (-5.1, 6.7)&lt;br /&gt;
+ (3.0, 10.9)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{&lt;br /&gt;
{{Show Answer|&lt;br /&gt;
This study is testing the difference between means, and significant differences would be either larger or smaller than 0. Thus, confidence intervals that do not contain 0 represent statistically significant findings.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{If a 95% confidence interval contains 0, so will the 99% confidence interval.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ True&lt;br /&gt;
- False&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{&lt;br /&gt;
{{Show Answer|&lt;br /&gt;
The 99% confidence interval contains all of the values that the 95% confidence interval has, but it extends farther at both ends and has other values, too. If something is not significant at the 0.05 level, it is also non-significant at the 0.01 level.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Select all that apply. A person is testing whether a coin that a magician uses is biased. After analyzing the results from his coin flipping, the p value ends up being 0.21, so he concludes that there is no evidence that the coin is biased. Based on this information, which of these is/are possible 95% confidence intervals on the population proportion of times heads comes up?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ (0.43, 0.55) &lt;br /&gt;
- (0.32, 0.46) &lt;br /&gt;
+ (0.48, 0.64) &lt;br /&gt;
- (0.76, 0.98)&lt;br /&gt;
- (0.81, 1.33)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{&lt;br /&gt;
{{Show Answer|&lt;br /&gt;
Because the p value was 0.21, we know that the 95% confidence interval contains the null hypothesis parameter, 0.5. Thus, both of the confidence intervals that contain 0.5 are possible confidence intervals that this researcher could have computed.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Statistics Links}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Izabela Szlachta</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>