<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://training-course-material.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Change_Management</id>
	<title>Change Management - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Change_Management"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Change_Management&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-24T10:48:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Change_Management&amp;diff=7820&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bernard Szlachta at 02:18, 17 November 2012</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://training-course-material.com/index.php?title=Change_Management&amp;diff=7820&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-11-17T02:18:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Cat|OCEB B200.5 - Quality and GRC}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OCEB Links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Change Management: The People Side of Change, Jeffrey Hiatt and Timothy Creasey - Prosci, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;slideshow style=&amp;quot;nobleprog&amp;quot; headingmark=&amp;quot;⌘&amp;quot; incmark=&amp;quot;…&amp;quot; scaled=&amp;quot;false&amp;quot; font=&amp;quot;Trebuchet MS&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;title: Change Management&lt;br /&gt;
;author: Bernard Szlachta (NobleProg Ltd)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/slideshow&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why Change Management? ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* People resist change (either good or ill)&lt;br /&gt;
* Manager can mitigate the resistance&lt;br /&gt;
* Technology changes are easier and cheaper these days than people attitude changes and learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems encountered ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
# Not adequate time and resources&lt;br /&gt;
# Wrong or negative message about the changes&lt;br /&gt;
# Employees who become distracted and lost interest&lt;br /&gt;
# Value employees left the organization&lt;br /&gt;
# More sick leavers or absenteeism&lt;br /&gt;
# Unforeseen obstacles poping out of nowhere&lt;br /&gt;
# Lack of funding for the change&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Executive Concerns ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
# Required Investement&lt;br /&gt;
# Financial Performance&lt;br /&gt;
# ROI&lt;br /&gt;
# Completion time&lt;br /&gt;
# Improvment capacity&lt;br /&gt;
# Impact on customers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Eployee Concerns ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
# Impact on my current job&lt;br /&gt;
# Job security&lt;br /&gt;
# Suitability of the new environment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two views of Change ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Organizational change management&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* the top-down executive view&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Individual change management&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* bottom-up employee view&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Primary change management principles ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* Senders and receivers&lt;br /&gt;
* Resistance and comfort&lt;br /&gt;
* Authority for change&lt;br /&gt;
* Value systems&lt;br /&gt;
* Incremental vs. radical change&lt;br /&gt;
* The right answer is not enough&lt;br /&gt;
* Change is a processes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senders and Receivers ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sender&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; provides information about the change&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Receiver&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is being given information about the change&lt;br /&gt;
* What a Sender says it not what a receiver hears and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
E.g.&lt;br /&gt;
 Sender: &amp;quot;We will reduce costs by automating this process and move people to more important tasks&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Receiver: &amp;quot;I may not have a job&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preferred Senders ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
Immediate supervisors: messages related to personal impact&lt;br /&gt;
* personal impact (salary, people I work with)&lt;br /&gt;
* day to day responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executives: messages related to business issues and opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
* external factors driving the change&lt;br /&gt;
* issues facing the business&lt;br /&gt;
* marketplace drivers&lt;br /&gt;
* financial risks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistance and comfort ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The natural and normal reaction to change is resistance&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan for resistance&lt;br /&gt;
* Assess aversion to change from holistic perspective (e.g. what other changes are there)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Authority for change ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible and active executive sponsorship&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Employee resistance increases as the authority and sponsorship for change decreases&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sponsor&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;quot;the individual or group who has the power to sanction or legitimize change&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employees will resist the change more if sponsor:&lt;br /&gt;
* is incompetent&lt;br /&gt;
* has know history of failed changes&lt;br /&gt;
* walks away too soon&lt;br /&gt;
* is not active and visible throughout the project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Value systems ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* In old hierarchical (military like) structure, change is easier to implement&lt;br /&gt;
* The more employees are empowered the harder the change will get (they expected to question management decisions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incremental vs. radical change ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* Change management should reflect the change size&lt;br /&gt;
* I.e. no &amp;quot;one size fits all&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The right answer is not enough ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* Right answer to a business problem is not sufficient to overcome employee resistance&lt;br /&gt;
* People resist &amp;quot;we know batter what you want&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Change is a processes ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
ADKAR:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Awareness&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the need to change&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Desire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to participate and support the change&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Knowledge&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; about how to change&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ability&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to implement new skills and behaviours&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Reinforcement&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to keep the change in place&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ADKAR and an individual ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* Each person can have a different rate of adapting to change&lt;br /&gt;
* I.e. some people can be in an Awareness mode, other already in Reinforcement&lt;br /&gt;
* Applying Change Management should be aligned with Project Management&lt;br /&gt;
** in the Business need stage, there should be focus on Awareness and Desire of the employees,&lt;br /&gt;
** In the Implementation, there should be focus on Knowledge and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ADKAR ⌘==&lt;br /&gt;
* Individual Change Management framework&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Communication framework&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Diagnostic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; tool (which department/person is on which stage)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Corrective Action&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; tool&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bernard Szlachta</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>